EdCamp was the
very first un-conference I have ever attended.
Going into this experience I had heard many great things about
experiences colleagues had had at Edcamp, but I had no clue what an
un-conference was all about. Soon after
arriving at the RIC Student Union Building, I found out.
After registration and some small talk with the other
educators at my table, I noticed someone taping blank pieces of white paper up
on the wall under the heading “The Board”.
Although I didn’t pay much attention to it, this did catch my
interest. Soon after finishing, one of
the leaders made a brief introduction and explained the purpose of “The Board”. “The Board” was made up of 6(ish) columns
across and 3 rows down 8 ½ x 11 pieces of paper. Later we learned that the columns designated
specific classrooms and the rows represented the three different sessions that
were available throughout the day. At
that point participants were encouraged to go up to “The Board” and write down
their ideas for a session that they would like to lead throughout the day. As an un-conference newbie this really blew
my mind! If nobody went up and
volunteered to lead a session, then the un-conference was over as soon as it
started. It didn’t take long, though,
before people were excitedly walking up and writing down ideas of topics that
they would like to share. Sessions
ranged from using Twitter, flipping classrooms, “Things that Suck” (which I can
imagine was a popular one!), Global Education, Current Trends in Education, and
many elementary topics that did not seem of relevance to me. After writing down ideas, one of the leaders
typed the topics in Word, displayed the topics on the screen, and people were
free to move from session to session to best meet their needs.
Edcamp was a new experience for me, because of the design of
the entire day. I chose to blog about
the experience instead of the content, because it was so new to me (and my Type
A personality). This was an experience
that completely depended on participation by the attendees in order to make it
successful. I believe that this was both
good and bad (as you can see in the following chart – again I will attribute it
to Type A personality).
|
Pros of EdCamp
|
Cons of EdCamp
|
|
·
Participants were encouraged to attend
sessions based on individual interest
|
·
Some sessions were chosen out of ‘last resort’,
because other topics didn’t apply
|
|
·
Participants were encouraged to move around
from session to session as they saw appropriate
|
·
At times became distracting, because there was
a lot of movement/switching of attendees
|
|
·
Free breakfast, T-shirt, and Water bottle
|
·
Nobody can argue with that
|
|
·
Well informed presenters
|
·
Due to design, presenters had no way of
gauging the prior knowledge of participants so some information was not
exactly what was expected
|
Overall, I enjoyed my experience at EdCamp, but definitely
can see how the participants/presenters can make or break the day. While I am not avidly “Google-ing” to see
when/where the next EdCamp is, I would attend one in the future if the opportunity
arises in this area in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment