The student
I chose for my case study, “C”, never discusses her religious thoughts or
beliefs in class, therefore, I decided from the beginning that this chapter
really wasn’t going to have any impact on my case study. I could not have been more wrong! Although C doesn’t discuss her beliefs
outwardly, through reading this chapter I could see that some of the conversations
she has do center around her trying to figure out who she is and what role she
is supposed to play in society inside and outside of her current living
situation.
In a recent
conversation with the managers at the house, I discovered that when C came to live
at the group home she would go “on pass” on Sundays to go to church. Her mother would come and pick her up, they
would go to church and sometimes to lunch, and she would return early Sunday
afternoon. Overtime, this became a point
of contention for the managers, staff, and other residents at the house,
because C would frequently misbehave during the week and then automatically get
to leave the house on Sundays, because it was for religious purposes. One of the consequences in the house is that
when you misbehave during the week, your weekend passes are taken away. Many individuals felt as though C was abusing
this privilege and getting away with inappropriate behaviors without
consequences. After losing her passes (based
on her behavior) to go to church a few weeks in a row, C now no longer leaves the
house to attend church with her family.
Initially it was due to her behavior, but now it’s a mutual decision
between the house and C’s mother. In
response, C states that she, “doesn’t care and doesn’t want to go anyway.”
A few weeks later, I found this
book in C’s stack of personal reading books that she keeps in/on her desk in
the classroom. Initially, I didn’t say
anything about it, but now I’m thinking this might provide a good opening for a
conversation that I wasn’t previously willing/equipped to have. As Nakkula suggests, "if we open spaces for adolescents to begin to answer existential questions in ways that make sense to them, we help them to develop intellectual and spiritual pathways out of unqualified relativism and into greater clarity (220)." By continuing to coauthor C's story and attempt to help her to make sense of some of these issues I think I can help her navigate through some of the difficulties and 'big questions' she is facing right now.
After reading this chapter I am torn about
the decision that was made for C about not attending church. I realized last week that everyone who C (as well as all of the
other girls in the group home) interacts with on a daily basis is paid to be
with her. The few hours a week that she
was able to spend with her mother and doing something to help construct who she
is becoming as a person were so valuable!
To take those away from her and stifle this aspect of her identity is very
disheartening.

I think N & T do a good job of stressing that we do not need to have the answers (and in fact students may not even need answers---just someone to talk to about the "big questions"). In order "to be a one of those adults, we must trust adolescents' capacity to articulate the questions they most need to ask" and engage in these discussions (229). And it's refreshing that by "engaging", we can use the "Well, I have some ideas there, but what do you think?" strategy (220)
ReplyDeleteYes!! I was actually looking for that final quote when I was writing my blog, but couldn't find it (clearly I didn't put a blue sticky by it)! I found a lot of comfort and reassurance in knowing that the authors were saying that it's okay to have a conversation and to be that person that our students can talk to without necessarily having all of the answers. I often have conversations about very serious topics with my students, but didn't really think about the impact on either of us until I read these chapters. Thanks Geoff!!
ReplyDelete