Keepin’ It Real –
Carter
In the beginning of this reading, Carter introduces the
concepts of dominant and nondominant cultural capital and the impact these have
on students in high schools today. The
chart below represents what he defines as the dominant vs. nondominant culture
capital (the page numbers did not copy clearly, so I apologize for not
including them here).
Dominant Cultural
Capital
|
Nondominant Cultural
Capital
|
|
|
Carter continues by interviewing and sharing the stories of
Black students who discuss how the concept of cultural power affects their
lives. She shares stories of individuals
who she spoke with over a ten month period.
During that time she had conversations with them to gain an understanding
about their perceptions on the role of culture in their lives. What she found was that, “no one devalued high
academic achievement, or cared if either they or their friends were smart, but
they did care if their peers repudiated in-group cultural codes and knowledge.”
One phrase that Carter introduced that was new to me was “cultural
straddlers”. She describes cultural
straddlers as people who, “willingly moved back and forth between their uses of
‘black’ and dominant linguistic capital.” (62) She shared the stories of Loretta, Bettina, and Moesha who are high
school graduates and are now in the workforce or attending college. All three of these ladies shared stories of speaking
one way at work/school and a different way around family and friends. They had learned that in order to be “socioeconomically
mobile” it benefitted them to use Standard English when at work and
school. If they continued this manner of
speech around family and friends though, they were at risk of being accused of “acting
white”. At home, these individuals preferred
to switch back into the accepted speech codes that were used by their family
and friends.
The article I am including this week is about McCaskey East High School where in
December of 2011 the school conducted an experiment in which they instituted all-black
homerooms for the schools juniors (the students who took the standardized test
that year). In addition to being all
black, the students were grouped by gender and paired with mentors of the same
race and gender to, “determine
if grouping students homogeneously for a brief period each day will help them
socially and academically.”
I was previously familiar with this story that made national news and have thought about it many times during our class discussions and readings this semester. The
part of this article that made me think of Carter’s piece is where a teacher,
Willie Thedford, shares the quote, “"One of the simplest things you notice
right away is, before, the pants were hanging down; now, they are up. The shirt
is tucked in, where before, it was hanging out. That's tangible.” This is one step that the teacher highlighted, which Delpit and Carter would consider the students learning and exhibiting the ways of the "culture of power." Could a program such as this one, which
matches students up with mentors of their same race and gender help the
students by being matched with positive role models? Or, as the other side of the argument goes,
does this program reinforce negative racial stereotypes and take a step
backward to the days of racial segregation?
Fascinating piece about the all black homeroom, especially given my commitment to running a mentoring network for students from underrepresented groups... really interesting!
ReplyDelete"before, the pants were hanging down; now, they are up. The shirt is tucked in, where before, it was hanging out."
ReplyDeletebut doesn't this muddle the black students cultural identity? I think Carter is saying that teachers should not judge, or try to change, a student's appearance. GK
I took this as what Carter might consider to be part of the process of being "cultural straddlers". While outside of school and with family and friends they may protect that cultural identity by dressing in a way that is more comfortable/natural to them. While in school, if the expectation has been set a certain way, they adapt to meet that expectation.
DeleteI read the article you posted and I think it is great, especially the philosophy of the program: "Let's make these guys think for six minutes about their future." I wonder from the class though, would this work at any or your schools? I have heard exclusively that Advisory Programs do not work, I have not heard anyone say that they do. We will be forced to have some kind of Advisory because our NEASC report stated that we need to (ugh). We have a School Improvement Team meeting this week to discuss and I would love the advice!!
ReplyDeleteThis homeroom idea was so controversial that the school ended up discontinuing it after about 2 months. It was met with much criticism by the local community and national news. My frustration is that this program seems well intentioned. It was something new and different, with the goal to produce new and different results such as more students being successful on the standardized state test. If we keep doing the same thing over and over again, won't we just keep getting the same results?
DeleteI like the way you did the text box within the blog! But regarding your post I also found the "cultural straddler" part very interesting because in a sense these students had enough "capital" to be able to switch between two differnet roles. They kept their identities around friends and family but were wise enough to play the part that mirrors what is within the culture of power. I wonder what it is about these cultural straddlers that make them different from their peers that refrain from anything that would deter from the norm in their cultures.
ReplyDeleteFor all you literature buffs, I think the following quote is appropriate here...
ReplyDelete"No man for any considerable period can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be true."
If I have any faith in this idea, I think it explains my frustration with "straddling."