Saturday, October 13, 2012

Keepin' It Real




Keepin’ It Real – Carter

In the beginning of this reading, Carter introduces the concepts of dominant and nondominant cultural capital and the impact these have on students in high schools today.  The chart below represents what he defines as the dominant vs. nondominant culture capital (the page numbers did not copy clearly, so I apologize for not including them here).

Dominant Cultural Capital
Nondominant Cultural Capital
  •  “Resource that can eventually yield some economic and social returns”
  • “knowledge and skills of high-status racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups”
  • “Provides students with access to certain attitudes, styles, preferences that enable their entry into high-status social groups, organizations, or institutions”
  • “Styles of speaking, interacting; knowledge of certain books, music, art, foods; and experience foreign and nationwide travel”
  • College preparatory, honors, and advanced placement expose students to dominant cultural capital
  • “Tastes, appreciations, and understandings, such as preferences for particular linguistic, musical, and dress styles, and physical gestures used by used by lower status group members to gain ‘authentic’ cultural status positions in their respective communities”
  • Signifies in-group allegiance and preserves a sense of belonging


Carter continues by interviewing and sharing the stories of Black students who discuss how the concept of cultural power affects their lives.  She shares stories of individuals who she spoke with over a ten month period.  During that time she had conversations with them to gain an understanding about their perceptions on the role of culture in their lives.  What she found was that, “no one devalued high academic achievement, or cared if either they or their friends were smart, but they did care if their peers repudiated in-group cultural codes and knowledge.”

One phrase that Carter introduced that was new to me was “cultural straddlers”.  She describes cultural straddlers as people who, “willingly moved back and forth between their uses of ‘black’ and dominant linguistic capital.” (62)  She shared the stories of Loretta, Bettina, and Moesha who are high school graduates and are now in the workforce or attending college.  All three of these ladies shared stories of speaking one way at work/school and a different way around family and friends.  They had learned that in order to be “socioeconomically mobile” it benefitted them to use Standard English when at work and school.  If they continued this manner of speech around family and friends though, they were at risk of being accused of “acting white”.  At home, these individuals preferred to switch back into the accepted speech codes that were used by their family and friends.

The article I am including this week is about McCaskey East High School where in December of 2011 the school conducted an experiment in which they instituted all-black homerooms for the schools juniors (the students who took the standardized test that year).  In addition to being all black, the students were grouped by gender and paired with mentors of the same race and gender to, “determine if grouping students homogeneously for a brief period each day will help them socially and academically.” 

I was previously familiar with this story that made national news and have thought about it many times during our class discussions and readings this semester.  The part of this article that made me think of Carter’s piece is where a teacher, Willie Thedford, shares the quote, “"One of the simplest things you notice right away is, before, the pants were hanging down; now, they are up. The shirt is tucked in, where before, it was hanging out. That's tangible.” This is one step that the teacher highlighted, which Delpit and Carter would consider the students learning and exhibiting the ways of the "culture of power."  Could a program such as this one, which matches students up with mentors of their same race and gender help the students by being matched with positive role models?  Or, as the other side of the argument goes, does this program reinforce negative racial stereotypes and take a step backward to the days of racial segregation?





7 comments:

  1. Fascinating piece about the all black homeroom, especially given my commitment to running a mentoring network for students from underrepresented groups... really interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "before, the pants were hanging down; now, they are up. The shirt is tucked in, where before, it was hanging out."

    but doesn't this muddle the black students cultural identity? I think Carter is saying that teachers should not judge, or try to change, a student's appearance. GK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I took this as what Carter might consider to be part of the process of being "cultural straddlers". While outside of school and with family and friends they may protect that cultural identity by dressing in a way that is more comfortable/natural to them. While in school, if the expectation has been set a certain way, they adapt to meet that expectation.

      Delete
  3. I read the article you posted and I think it is great, especially the philosophy of the program: "Let's make these guys think for six minutes about their future." I wonder from the class though, would this work at any or your schools? I have heard exclusively that Advisory Programs do not work, I have not heard anyone say that they do. We will be forced to have some kind of Advisory because our NEASC report stated that we need to (ugh). We have a School Improvement Team meeting this week to discuss and I would love the advice!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This homeroom idea was so controversial that the school ended up discontinuing it after about 2 months. It was met with much criticism by the local community and national news. My frustration is that this program seems well intentioned. It was something new and different, with the goal to produce new and different results such as more students being successful on the standardized state test. If we keep doing the same thing over and over again, won't we just keep getting the same results?

      Delete
  4. I like the way you did the text box within the blog! But regarding your post I also found the "cultural straddler" part very interesting because in a sense these students had enough "capital" to be able to switch between two differnet roles. They kept their identities around friends and family but were wise enough to play the part that mirrors what is within the culture of power. I wonder what it is about these cultural straddlers that make them different from their peers that refrain from anything that would deter from the norm in their cultures.

    ReplyDelete
  5. For all you literature buffs, I think the following quote is appropriate here...

    "No man for any considerable period can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be true."

    If I have any faith in this idea, I think it explains my frustration with "straddling."

    ReplyDelete